Complete. I love that word. Is it ever really complete? At some point you have to leave the kid alone or he'll come out demented, but it's hard to know when you've hit the point of diminishing returns. Every time I take a look at my ms, I want to add things, change things, pull things out.
When you get to the point of changing the same word within the same paragraph back and forth between two choices - you've reached the point of diminishing returns. Maybe you need to sit back and leave it alone. Let it simmer for several weeks.
Here's a thought. Perfect my query letter. Work on my synopsis. Or, just as good, work on the next ms. When I need to take a break, I go research the writer's world. Help others with critiques, even with limited knowledge. After all, as readers, we're as much the target audience as writers.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Following Directions
Failure to follow directions often means failure to launch. If an agent asks you not to include links or attachments, don't be surprised if they form reject the full query when you do. Agents usually offer reasonably clear instructions for queries. Find them, read them, follow them.
Still, agents should understand not everyone thinks the same way. Sometimes what makes a writer's work interesting is an odd perspective. Clarity is worthwhile for the agent as for the writer.
Some agents have rigid ideas of what a query should be, but many will entertain anything well presented, though 'well presented' is a matter of mood. I don't begrudge them their humanity. I'm sure they don't begrudge me the salve to my ego.
There are things I'd like clarified, though, and I hope some agents read this and try to make my task a little easier.
"Send a query and the first five pages of your manuscript..."
Assume 12pt, double spaced with one-inch margins in either Times New Roman or Courier... roughly 250 words/page. Yet I stress over details. Should I cut off in the middle of a paragraph? A sentence? If not, may I finish one begun, or must I end the page early? When you only have roughly 1,250 words, it matters.
Sabrina's novel has a sizeable prologue. It establishes history, setting, and expectations, but describes relevant events eighty years prior to the story of the book itself. While the voice and style are basically the same, the only character alive in the rest of the book isn't introduced until much later, well after five pages. Is that the "first five pages" they want? She's started ignoring the prologue and sends from the actual chapter one, but that's not the first thing a reader will see. We don't want to be disingenuous, either by including or omitting it. Which is correct?
Still, agents should understand not everyone thinks the same way. Sometimes what makes a writer's work interesting is an odd perspective. Clarity is worthwhile for the agent as for the writer.
Some agents have rigid ideas of what a query should be, but many will entertain anything well presented, though 'well presented' is a matter of mood. I don't begrudge them their humanity. I'm sure they don't begrudge me the salve to my ego.
There are things I'd like clarified, though, and I hope some agents read this and try to make my task a little easier.
"Send a query and the first five pages of your manuscript..."
Assume 12pt, double spaced with one-inch margins in either Times New Roman or Courier... roughly 250 words/page. Yet I stress over details. Should I cut off in the middle of a paragraph? A sentence? If not, may I finish one begun, or must I end the page early? When you only have roughly 1,250 words, it matters.
Sabrina's novel has a sizeable prologue. It establishes history, setting, and expectations, but describes relevant events eighty years prior to the story of the book itself. While the voice and style are basically the same, the only character alive in the rest of the book isn't introduced until much later, well after five pages. Is that the "first five pages" they want? She's started ignoring the prologue and sends from the actual chapter one, but that's not the first thing a reader will see. We don't want to be disingenuous, either by including or omitting it. Which is correct?
Posting Rejection Letters
I've discussed this with Paul and here's what we've come up with.
Posting the format of rejection letters in a generalized way can be a great help to other writers. Knowing what to expect makes you feel less isolated when you do receive that rejection letter.
Posting an agent's name and rejection letter word for word is about as professional as having that agent post your query letter without your permission. Personally, I don't mind having my query posted. That gives me the chance to earn feedback and gives other writers one possible sample (good or bad). Not everyone feels as I do.
I do believe that agents should be as professional in their rejection letters as anything else. Firing off a nasty note in the heat of the moment shows a lack of professionalism and no writer should want to deal with that anymore than an agent wants to deal with an unprofessional writer. However, nastiness is often, and deserves to be, outed. Both agents and writers should remain aware that the definition of privacy is changing rapidly and after-the-fact lawsuits may not salve reputations.
That said, I will not post rejection letters, nor name agents. I will discuss the fact of some of my rejections, which may be legion, and perhaps the tone of rejection letters received. I will also post my reactions to said rejection letters and how they affect my overall outlook and whether they spark changes to my query, synopsis, or ms. But no more than that.
Posting the format of rejection letters in a generalized way can be a great help to other writers. Knowing what to expect makes you feel less isolated when you do receive that rejection letter.
Posting an agent's name and rejection letter word for word is about as professional as having that agent post your query letter without your permission. Personally, I don't mind having my query posted. That gives me the chance to earn feedback and gives other writers one possible sample (good or bad). Not everyone feels as I do.
I do believe that agents should be as professional in their rejection letters as anything else. Firing off a nasty note in the heat of the moment shows a lack of professionalism and no writer should want to deal with that anymore than an agent wants to deal with an unprofessional writer. However, nastiness is often, and deserves to be, outed. Both agents and writers should remain aware that the definition of privacy is changing rapidly and after-the-fact lawsuits may not salve reputations.
That said, I will not post rejection letters, nor name agents. I will discuss the fact of some of my rejections, which may be legion, and perhaps the tone of rejection letters received. I will also post my reactions to said rejection letters and how they affect my overall outlook and whether they spark changes to my query, synopsis, or ms. But no more than that.
Beginning The Quest For a Literary Agent
I must admit, I'm enjoying the query process. I'm researching agents, chatting with interesting people, learning all about the infamous query letter. Writing a query letter takes almost as much sweat as writing a 97,000 word ms. It's scary. It's also necessary to finding a literary agent.
I'm not going to detail query letter writing here. My friend Denise Tompkins did a great job of that already, so be sure and check out her post on the topic here. Remember that query letter writing is not an exact science. Some of the oddest (to me) query letters have been posted on the net as success stories, and some of the ones I thought were fantastic don't seem to generate results. Read all you can about writing a query letter and then do you.
In any case, I've written my query letter and tweaked and polished for about three weeks. I'm not sure that's enough. I've tried to think like a literary agent <snicker>, put my inexperienced self in the shoes of a literary agent, and still am not sure it's where it should be. Nevertheless, I've started sending out those query letters.
One piece of the agent puzzle some sites and books forget to mention is reading directions. A lot of agents have web sites. Why is it then, that people fail to follow directions, despite the fact that it will get them rejected? Jennifer Jackson is one literary agent who mentions rejections on the basis of failure to follow directions. Think about that. If you cannot follow basic directions, what agent will ever want to work with you?
So far, I've been told my baby is ugly three times. Well, not really. No agent has told me my ms is hairy or warty. It just feels that way. Details to follow.
I'm not going to detail query letter writing here. My friend Denise Tompkins did a great job of that already, so be sure and check out her post on the topic here. Remember that query letter writing is not an exact science. Some of the oddest (to me) query letters have been posted on the net as success stories, and some of the ones I thought were fantastic don't seem to generate results. Read all you can about writing a query letter and then do you.
In any case, I've written my query letter and tweaked and polished for about three weeks. I'm not sure that's enough. I've tried to think like a literary agent <snicker>, put my inexperienced self in the shoes of a literary agent, and still am not sure it's where it should be. Nevertheless, I've started sending out those query letters.
One piece of the agent puzzle some sites and books forget to mention is reading directions. A lot of agents have web sites. Why is it then, that people fail to follow directions, despite the fact that it will get them rejected? Jennifer Jackson is one literary agent who mentions rejections on the basis of failure to follow directions. Think about that. If you cannot follow basic directions, what agent will ever want to work with you?
So far, I've been told my baby is ugly three times. Well, not really. No agent has told me my ms is hairy or warty. It just feels that way. Details to follow.
Rejection
You've spent all this time on the nest, nourishing your baby with your own blood, sweat and tears. You've suffered aches and pains, loss of sleep, shortness of breath, a fragile temper until finally - BIRTH! You've delivered a bouncing baby manuscript. You've given it a bath, changed its diaper, dressed it all up in pretty clothes and sent it out into the world.
Of course, after you've sent it out for appraisal, you realize there are holes in the clothes, stains in the diaper and you forgot to wipe its chin. No matter, it's still a beautiful baby.
That's your opinion. It's the job of agents and editors to tell you what they see as the sad truth.
Your baby is ugly.
What parent wants to hear their precious bundle has warts? If you want to make the journey into publishing, you'll need to hear it again and again.
And that's what this blog is about. Hearing your baby is ugly is part and parcel of becoming published. So is believing that you're right and all those rejections are wrong, though you'll still need to have open ears. A willingness to wipe off the drool when someone points it out is important if you ever want them to hold your prospective tyke.
We'll be discussing our journey along the road to becoming authors - honest to goodness, published folk. We'll try to keep it honest, to show you where our babies get their big noses and crooked toes. We'll also show you the beautiful heads of hair and straight limbs we hope some lucky agent will notice.
Of course, after you've sent it out for appraisal, you realize there are holes in the clothes, stains in the diaper and you forgot to wipe its chin. No matter, it's still a beautiful baby.
That's your opinion. It's the job of agents and editors to tell you what they see as the sad truth.
Your baby is ugly.
What parent wants to hear their precious bundle has warts? If you want to make the journey into publishing, you'll need to hear it again and again.
And that's what this blog is about. Hearing your baby is ugly is part and parcel of becoming published. So is believing that you're right and all those rejections are wrong, though you'll still need to have open ears. A willingness to wipe off the drool when someone points it out is important if you ever want them to hold your prospective tyke.
We'll be discussing our journey along the road to becoming authors - honest to goodness, published folk. We'll try to keep it honest, to show you where our babies get their big noses and crooked toes. We'll also show you the beautiful heads of hair and straight limbs we hope some lucky agent will notice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)